Blog Archives

Staging Nostalgia’s Message

As Americans resume their loving relationship with The Goldbergs, the intrigue into everything that goes into creating and producing this sensational sitcom reaches new heights with each new episode.

Fortunately, the people at The Hollywood Reporter and Haley Orrantia (Erica) joined forces for a behind-the-scenes tour of everything special about one of the greatest gifts from the ’80s.

Greatest gift meaning that we get to relive that decade’s amazingness every Wednesday night at 8:30 p.m. on ABC.

Oh, and a bit of social media awesomeness happened last night at the end of The Goldbergs…

(The Goldbergs Twitter)

(The Goldbergs Twitter)

My favorite moment this season!

There’s Nothing to Worry About

“Do you want to go out this Friday?”

Far too often, single men and women are overly analytical when it comes to dating. Both sexes can be found guilty in this respect. And whether it’s a first date or trying to secure a second date, hysteria starts to overwhelm any sense of calmness.

“Why hasn’t she texted yet? She replied quickly to everything else I wrote. Should I have disagreed with her about that book she likes? Does she like me for the right reasons?”

This anxiousness, I think, started to become a hyper-obsession with increasing popularity and frequency of romantic comedies, as well as the introduction of social media. Now, it must be stated that some rom-coms are good and that social media and texting can be fantastic mediums for communicating early on in a relationship and/or dating. There is literally almost nothing better in the earliest phase of dating than a girl you like replying to your text with those three dots blinking that results in a sweet sentiment and a smiley face.

Admit it, your eyes light up.

When Facebook first came out (well, as thefacebook.com) in 2004, it was an incredible bridge for young men and women in college to flirt and introduce themselves beyond a quick “hello” in the cafeteria in a new, non-traditional fashion (ironically, this is traditional practice now). However, Facebook is not the same now as when it first entered our lives ~ a decade ago. Regardless, Facebook was a better, more interactive alternative to email. There was an investment in it. Those moments of waiting for a response in-between classes always had a fun, surprise element to it.

Interestingly, this is all kind of amusing because nerves and butterflies are a good thing when meeting someone new. In fact, it’s a great feeling. This experience should be exciting and different from any other routine activity. If you’re not excited, then something’s wrong. Dating is a thrilling game, intended to reveal a potentially natural magnetism towards someone special…or not. But in the case of the former, all those nerves instantly translate into the most indescribable feelings of happiness.

It’s a truly beautiful thing.

We should accept these nerves as they are because when we meet the right person, the payoff will be eternally worthwhile. We shouldn’t panic and sift through every single detail of our interactions with this person. We should just go with the flow.

Case and point: Instead of over-analyzing the social media aspects of dating and communicating with someone we like, I should have just played the following clip:

Larry David, the man who co-authored the brilliant comedic movement about nothing, has somehow (once again) taught us everything we need to know about interacting with people in various situations.

Despite being a fish in the dark, his vision’s pretty, pretty good.

Back to the Past in the Present

“…the oddest thing about what’s happening right now is that we’ve stopped living our lives and we’re just recording them”
— George Clooney (Esquire interview, 2013)

Pinpoint insight from Mr. Clooney who (like many of us) have been increasingly aware that the appeal and function of social media is overwhelming our natural instincts to live and simply exist in the moment. Social media has its positives and negatives and its consumers continue to make these determinations for its value each and every day. However, it has reached a critical fork-in-the-road whereby people need to determine if we (in the picture taking and video recording sense) want to be a present or past society?

Snapping (well, tapping) a picture is a good, fun thing. But tapping photos of everything is not and the same notion qualifies for recording video. We need to remember how to filter the important from the mundane. There is a difference. And not to be misunderstood, taking an amazing photo and/or video is certainly a cool thing. Without question. But as Ferris Bueller famously said, “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around every once in a while, you could miss it.”

Wise words.

Why should we relentlessly restrict our lives to a 4-inch screen when the entire world is within our reach and sight? What do you think Michael Cera?

The randomness of life is so awesome that we shouldn’t limit these incredible chance moments from happening right in front of us.

Think of it as “Instaliving.”

The Silent Defense

“We still fear what we don’t know”
–The Killers (band)

Two unfortunate realities in the modern era are increased hiding places from experiences that are difficult and the wavering definition of logic. It’s becoming increasingly apparent that logic is only logical until it’s not. This confusion surrounding logic only affects most all of our decisions, so no big deal, right?

Are things still going well? Of course, because of A, B and C. But then why did this occur or not get a response? Everything seemed to be on the same path, just like past events…What just happened? Why? And, undoubtedly, the worst sound of all: enduring, completely mysterious silence.

Talk about one hell of an apparently fluid concept to attempt to conquer and understand.

When these two forces collide, the reaction is something quite remarkable. What’s fashioned is a double-edged sword, sharpened for the causes of convenience and defense. Adding to the dynamism of this creation is its ambiguity of action. For those who voluntarily select (key phrase here) such an object to use, it may first appear as the attractive recourse. Not only easier, but it’s less stressful for the user. In the eyes of many these days, that’s the primary criteria. What’s the most facile choice for me? Distance, in a world of closeness and opinions as told through constant communication channels, is a strange phenomenon. One day (or one minute), we can be intimately connected with someone. Then, the next day or week, this same passageway can be cut-off without explanation like scissors to a phone cord.

A devastating disconnect.

As frequently and creatively as we communicate and profess to be connected to each other like never before, this truth can often transpire into levels of fiction because of the convenience these popular mediums enable. Living with information all around us, we aren’t receiving anywhere close to the complete truth in too many cases when knowing more is desired and needed. Instead, we’re living amongst scattered pieces without a comprehensive understanding. There are voids of vital details that should be revealed, but it’s been unilaterally decided by one party to remain hidden and untold.

Why?

Because that’s what swords do, they shred any chance at the truth until people give up and retreat.